Loading…
Each note states a question, a method, and why it matters. These are not published papers. A personal name is omitted until the faculty directory carries that supervisor.
The question is how a public institution can audit an automated decision without treating the model as an oracle. The method is a supervision paper: a written case, a small empirical check, and a defence. It matters because the faculty teaches AI beside public law, and the doctoral college will not list a group until a lead is named on the faculty pages.
The question is which biological measurements can be joined to a computational paper without overstating a clinical result. The method is a methods note and a supervised re-analysis of a published dataset. It matters for the natural sciences faculty. No therapeutic claim is made here.
The question is how a historical or philosophical argument should sit inside a university that also teaches computation. The method is an essay under supervision, not a laboratory result. The group exists as a teaching commitment. It will gain a named lead when that appointment is published.